The Queen’s Bench Court for Saskatchewan recently applied the Saskatchewan International Commercial Arbitration Act (SICAA) and the UNCITRAL Model law annexed to that Act and stayed an action based on the Saskatchewan Consumer Protection Act and a contract which was apparently between two Canadian entities. The decision in Zwack v. Pocha is important for two [...]
Continue Reading →Does The UNCITRAL Model Law Apply To A Claim Under The Consumer Protection ACT?
Posted by: Thomas Heintzman
Supreme Court of Canada Holds: Court May Dismiss Action Based On An International Commercial Agreement Even After The Defendant Files A Defence
Posted by: Thomas Heintzman
A very recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada has held that a court may properly dismiss an action arising from an international commercial agreement, even after the defendant has filed a Statement of Defence: Momentous.ca Corp. v. Canadian American Association of Professional Baseball Ltd. This decision is important since the contracts in issue [...]
Continue Reading →Playing Offence, Not Defence, In International Arbitrations
Posted by: Thomas Heintzman
What is the best way to protect the authority of international commercial arbitrations? Is a party obliged to “play defence” and not ask the courts of the seat of the arbitration to interfere until after arbitration proceedings are commenced? Or can a party “play offense” and ask those courts to take jurisdiction before any arbitration [...]
Continue Reading →Domain Name Disputes: Should They Be Resolved In A Court Or An Arbitral Tribunal?
Posted by: Thomas Heintzman
Should A Court Or An Arbitral Tribunal Resolve Domain Name Disputes? The Court of Appeal for Ontario has just released its decision in Tucows.Com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A. This decision is a legal landmark in relation to Internet domain names. The Court held that domain names are personal property and may be the [...]
Continue Reading →